the law is an ass

May 2, 2004
318
9
0
scotland
#1
dont know how the law in whatever country your from works regarding this.

the law regarding rape cases is a complete joke. im not talking sentancing or that but the naming of the person charged with it.this person could be totally innocent but will have their name and photo in the paper or on tv. this is way wrong as he will be ever associated with a rape, also wen a women cries rape she has anonimity even if the case is dismissed.... and in 90% of made up claims of rape the womans right to anonimity is upheld even though she is guilty of making up an horrific accusation that wiil destroy a man life. both the accused and the accuser should remain anonymous until the outcome of the trial,that way if the person is innocent they have the chance of a normal life again
 

Karly

giggity
May 17, 2003
2,393
91
0
New Yuck
#2
hmmm? are you saying women are given more from the law, & that its unfair to men?
 
S

seaweed

#3
Those of you that read news in Asia would know, but there was a case 2-3 months ago where a lady accused an old man for theft and called for help near an ATM. The 60 year old man got held down by a nearby security guard and several other passerbys and by the time the old man was released, the poor old man died from heart failure due from having his heart pressured when being held down. The lady who called accused the old man for theft has not been found, and she apparently was trying to take money out of the old man's account while he was being held.

It's so easy for women to get away with things these days......

I'd wish to keep my background somewhat private so I wont give description on where this occurred.
 
3

321 gizzo

#4
cops wanna treat women better than men so they can get a blowjob
 
Apr 22, 2004
1,652
30
0
Brokedown Palace
#5
It's not the courts fault, it's the damn media. The media is pretty much the controler of peoples minds and it can and DOES wreck peoples lives.
 
May 2, 2004
318
9
0
scotland
#6
i think the media should take a stand and not name people who are ACCUSED of rape. at least wait until the person has been found guilty (if that is the case) before printing his name/photo. as well as campaigning for the naming and shaming of women who falsely accuse men of rape. it is just not fair, men accused and cleared of rape will never be able to live normal lives unless they move hundreds of miles away and that is not fair as the accusations will always linger
 
D

Delta

#7
hmmm? are you saying women are given more from the law, & that its unfair to men?
I would say that that is a fair assumption. When it comes to crimes or things where it is a man against a woman, the court seems to always think that the woman is right unless proven wrong. Rape casses are one good example. Sexual harrasement is as well. Men have been deamonized over the last couple of decades.

Why oh why did we have to give you women the right to vote?.............. :p
 
F

fubar

#8
Delta said:
.
Why oh why did we have to give you women the right to vote?.............. :p
so we could get blowjobs.
 

Karly

giggity
May 17, 2003
2,393
91
0
New Yuck
#9
this ramitten dweeb sounds too much like keith lockhart- esp a thread about women? :rolleyes:
 
R

RFAlias

#12
Why is it every thread about women gets bashed on all the time, by women.
Is it not a legit thing to debate about? I think it is.
Women do have more rights than men. Just like Minorities have more rights than white people. What happend to everyone is equal?

Uh oh, im the keith guy now :rolleyes: Never stand up for your self, against women.
 

Nocturnal

Americana
Premium
Mar 27, 2003
13,662
115
0
Jacksonville
#13
RFAlias said:
Why is it every thread about women gets bashed on all the time, by women.
Is it not a legit thing to debate about? I think it is.
Women do have more rights than men. Just like Minorities have more rights than white people. What happend to everyone is equal?

Uh oh, im the keith guy now :rolleyes: Never stand up for your self, against women.

the problem is that most that make these types of threads resort to racial or sexist remarks and do not add anything to the conversation. Then anyone making a legitamite point is seen as sexist, racist, etc.
 
B

BigMattTheHobo

#14
I didn't know I had more rights then you crackers, cool.


:rolleyes:
 
R

RFAlias

#15
Yes, that is true, but everyone who talks about it should not be classes as sexist/racist. Thats just stupid, and unfair to the people who are not trying to be like that. Its funny, people that claim to be open minded, really arent.
But on topic, Names should not be disclosed until the final verdict is decided.

In the event that the alledged rapeist is not guilty, his name should not be disclosed, but that of the person who wrongfully accused of someone.
Whoever is at fault, their name should be released so their reputation is tarnished, because people who do that, either rape, or accusing someone of something they didnt do, deserve to be outcasts.
 
R

RFAlias

#16
BigMattTheHobo said:
I didn't know I had more rights then you crackers, cool.


:rolleyes:
I dont know your ethnic background, but in most cases, it is true.
Why isn't there like a thousand scholarships for white males? There was very very few, and of thoes, i didnt qualify still because of my parents financial status. But in the process, i noticed loads of them for minorities, just because someone is black or hispanic dosent mean they lack the same ablities as a white person, Oo, but the black family's great great great grand parents were slaves... but how does that effect the descendant? Oh, you are right, it dosent.
What im getting at is weather you want to see it or not, Minorities get more benifits than just the regular white guy.
 

Sketcher

Let the chaos begin
Feb 18, 2004
7,691
193
0
33
Connecticut, USA
#17
RFAlias said:
I dont know your ethnic background, but in most cases, it is true.
Why isn't there like a thousand scholarships for white males? There was very very few, and of thoes, i didnt qualify still because of my parents financial status. But in the process, i noticed loads of them for minorities, just because someone is black or hispanic dosent mean they lack the same ablities as a white person, Oo, but the black family's great great great grand parents were slaves... but how does that effect the descendant? Oh, you are right, it dosent.
Your right. I even saw scholarships for left handed people (again, minority). This is definately a case of minorities getting an advantage over the majority just because of who they are and for no other reason. Same with affermative action. I thought in this country everyone was equal. Guess not.
 
R

RFAlias

#18
Wow, someone who agrees.

I have to say, Affermative action, should be renamed to affermative blacktion.
I am in no way racist, but they have really gotten out of hand with some of the stuff that they do.
 
May 2, 2004
318
9
0
scotland
#19
mamichuli said:
this ramitten dweeb sounds too much like keith lockhart- esp a thread about women? :rolleyes:
so are you all for the naming of a rape suspect even if he turns out innocent,ruining quite possibly his marraige, employment or his entire family. i always thought that people were innocent until proven guilty, so why shouldnt the accused be given the same right to anonimity as the victim, if hes guilty fair enough, name him but why should an innocent person be made to suffer all because of some stupid bitch who had a one night stand,regretted it the next day and cries rape all because she,was married or engaged and her fella finds out.

does that make me a dweeb as you call it? no it makes me some one who would like to see a fairer system of handling rape and other sex crimes because of the stigma related to being accused of one. not that i have any personal experience of such matters

or are you one of these dungaree wearing,, "men are all pigs" shouting, think i'll stick to my 9"strap on kind of females who doesnt know when things like the above are wrong? :rolleyes:
 
R

RFAlias

#20
ramittinbawdeep said:
so are you all for the naming of a rape suspect even if he turns out innocent,ruining quite possibly his marraige, employment or his entire family. i always thought that people were innocent until proven guilty, so why shouldnt the accused be given the same right to anonimity as the victim, if hes guilty fair enough, name him but why should an innocent person be made to suffer all because of some stupid bitch who had a one night stand,regretted it the next day and cries rape all because she,was married or engaged and her fella finds out.

does that make me a dweeb as you call it? no it makes me some one who would like to see a fairer system of handling rape and other sex crimes because of the stigma related to being accused of one. not that i have any personal experience of such matters

or are you one of these dungaree wearing,, "men are all pigs" shouting, think i'll stick to my 9"strap on kind of females who doesnt know when things like the above are wrong? :rolleyes:

I have to say i agree with you, although in saying that, we both will end up being banned. Oh well.