Welcome to EMUSE!

EmuseForum is your #1 forum for General Discussions, The weird & wonderful, Politics, Sexy Babes, Porn and more!

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

US forced to import bullets from Israel!

Discussion in 'World News & Events' started by leon_corterly, Sep 28, 2005.

  1. leon_corterly

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    US forced to import bullets from Israel as troops use 250,000 for every rebel killed

    US forces have fired so many bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan - an estimated 250,000 for every insurgent killed - that American ammunition-makers cannot keep up with demand. As a result the US is having to import supplies from Israel.... (continued)

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article314944.ece
     
    #1 leon_corterly, Sep 28, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2005
  2. Secret Squirrel

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,358
    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    I'm not too sure about that 250,000 bullets per insurgent killed, but yes, we are buying ammo from foreign suppliers, to be used in training so that American made ammo can be used in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't see this as a big deal. People would have raised hell in the 90s if we'd bought enough ammo to keep more ammo production alive in the US.
     
  3. Kazimierz

    Kazimierz Vox Vocis of Causa
    Premium

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    8,201
    Ratings:
    +366 /0 /-0
    Good. Hopefully we'll save some money.

    Wait. Israel. Nevermind... Shalom!
     
  4. Nocturnal

    Nocturnal Americana
    Premium

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,662
    Ratings:
    +116 /0 /-0
    I bolded the problem with that statement, we aren't forced to do anything. Just like we aren't "forced" to buy sneakers from china.
     
  5. Asbestos Crayon

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    2,503
    Ratings:
    +81 /0 /-0
    Ok, lets get to the real reason this is happening.
    1. Our manufacturing base is gone. All we do have is just a very small fraction of the original base.
    2. Bullets are made using screw machines. The machines we are using now in the US were made in the 40's and the companies that make ammo for the US, like ATK, are cheap asses that don't have any forward thinking people in management. Their idea of running a company is bleed it dry to the point that you spend nothing to produce the bare minimum. And most of the times, they fuck up that bare minimum they do make.
    3. So why Israel? Because Israel is one of the largest producers of maching equipment in the world. And since we don't have a company here that can still make a screw machine, we have to rely on them.
     
  6. Blue25

    Blue25 Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    LMFAO! :hilarious: :bow: :bow:
     
  7. csite

    csite Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,703
    Ratings:
    +2 /0 /-0
    if i ever happen to have a few Billion $'s about i'll be sure to invest it in weaponry company in America, they must be so rich.
     
  8. leon_corterly

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    Why don't we discuss the 900 lb gorilla...

    We didn't go to Iraq or Afghanistan for WMDs or Oil...

    The real reason why to defend Israel from a potential threat, NOT the United States!

    However, it is not at all PC to talk about this... Now why would that be? :rolleyes:


    See source: MICHAEL MOORE'S FAHRENHEIT 9/11 IGNORES
    MOST OBVIOUS REASON FOR IRAQ WAR
    http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/siteinfo/newsround/iraq5.html

     
    #8 leon_corterly, Sep 28, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2005
  9. Secret Squirrel

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,358
    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    Incidentally, we're also buying ammo from the Brits right now. That's what Army units in Europe are using for training this year. No big deal, it's more or less the same as the ammo made in the US.

    As for companies in the US not investing in new equipment, where would the motivation for that be? Prior to 9/11 the US hadn't fought a protracted war for thirty years, and the capacity they had was meeting demand.
     
  10. clutch-monkey

    clutch-monkey momentum
    Premium

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,892
    Ratings:
    +203 /0 /-0
    it sounds about right, but idk how they measure it.
    remember in WW2 for every casualty 55 tons of ordnance was expended.
     
  11. Secret Squirrel

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,358
    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    Our training and weapons have improved significantly though. In WW2 guys didn't even zero sights on their weapons. I'm not saying we don't use a lot of rounds, somewhere in the 100s probably, but 250,000 is enormous.

    A double basic load for a rifleman is somewhere in the neighborhood of 240 rounds. Anyways, I'm curious how they determined the number of 250,000. Just sounds high.
     
  12. bergshadow

    bergshadow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,280
    Ratings:
    +48 /0 /-0
    It isn't just bullets. The offshoring and outsourcing that has moved so much US manufacturing overseas has created foreign dependency for stuff from body armor to missile guidance modules.

    In theory, companies that did not modernize would lose their military supply contracts to more competitive companies. That would require clean, non-corrupt military procurement agencies and contractual oversight, plus a well-governed (competitive) market.

    With so much of the US economy tied to the military, corruption and inefficiency in military procurement has widespread influence.
     
  13. a/k

    a/k .

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,473
    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    it only takes one...

    BOOM HEADSHOT!

    I'm going to hell...
     
  14. Secret Squirrel

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,358
    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    I won't argue that our procurement system is all kinds of screwed up, there's plenty of evidence for that. My point was that in the specific area of rifle ammunition, we've fairly consistently bought the same amount of ammo every year for thirty years. If a company had the production capability to meet that demand, there is little incentive to modernize, unless new technology comes along that allows you to produce the product with lower overhead. I don't think that's the case with ammunition, though I don't know for sure. I just don't see a good business case prior to 9/11 for an ammo company to expand their production, especiallly for 5.56mm ammo.
     
  15. shade

    shade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,013
    Ratings:
    +198 /0 /-0
    Weve bought ammo from israel for over 10 years.
     
  16. StinkyFinger

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    The way the number 250,000 is reached is by taking the total amount of 'rounds fired, and dividing it by the total estimated insurgents/enemy killed. Just like in Nam, that number is a joke. So kids, when looking at these so-called numbers about enemy kill ratios and 'rounds, take it with a grain of salt. :rolleyes:
     
  17. TacticalVirus

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    Is there a reason it's going to training and not being used in Iraq? I mean, it's not like the rounds made in the U.S. are particularly high quality. We're actually told not to use U.S. rounds unless we absoloutly have to because they're weaker and dirtier.
     
  18. StinkyFinger

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    How is the 5.56 NATO weaker than any other 5.56 NATO. The grain count is exactly the same. :wtf:
     
  19. TacticalVirus

    Ratings:
    +0 /0 /-0
    According to our weapons tech the 5.56 Nato made in Canada has a higher quality powder or something. It's supposed to burn cleaner/better. Then again that could be complete patriotic B.S.
     
  20. clutch-monkey

    clutch-monkey momentum
    Premium

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,892
    Ratings:
    +203 /0 /-0
    well, think about how many people the canadians have to supply compared to america. can you blame the US for cutting a few minor corners here and there? :) surely it wouldn't matter too much, the current bullet weighs 62 gr right?
    i know if australia was invaded by indonesia, they have more people than we have bullets :D
     

Share This Page