EmuseForum is your #1 forum for General Discussions, The weird & wonderful, Politics, Sexy Babes, Porn and more!
Discussion in 'Everything/Nothing' started by Mr. Heskey, Dec 10, 2006.
me? I say North Dakota.
Basing my answer soley on economic output, I'm going with Vermont. Vermot ranks last in gross state product. North Dakota is second worst by the way.
Massachusetts, Texas, Florida, California.
Montana? I don't know. I'm not even sure that's a state. jk, but seriously no one cares about them.
Idaho? eh.. they have pototoes.. and I like potatoes. North Dakota sucks, Kansas does too.
Maybe they're four of the most significant?
I live in the most significant state in the known universe
Except Massachusetts, they suck.
Oaxaca? 10 messicans
No. They're insignificant. You can add New York and Pennsylvania to that list. The most significant are the Sonoran/Chihuahan/Great Basin states.
It's not even a state. It's a commonwealth.
Nah. They have Family Guy, and are famous for being small.
we dont hear much about north or south dakota...sometimes i forget they even exist...rhode island is kinda usless.
They're insignificant in the way that they're barely there. An actual state that I never hear about or anything would probably be South Dakota.. so I think maybe I change my vote.
rhode island has no sales tax right? i'd say they're innovative..
California, Texas, New York they all supply the 3 things this world could do without -Homosexuals -Cowboys/Retards -New Yorkers
Rhode Island is a measuring device. Whenever you hear how large a certain area is, you get it in terms of Rhode Island's. I.E. The blast of a nuclear bomb of so and so magnitude would cover an area 5 times larger than the state of Rhode Island.